Monday, July 1, 2013

Crash

k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
The movie Crash depicts the stereotypes and prejudices each of us experiences in our society. Most of the characters are racially biased and become involved in incidents which force them to confront their own prejudices. As the plot unfolds, the characters realize that perspectives about people can change.
k
k
k
k
use activity or discuss reactions to certain scenes, from pdf file...

What is the message(s) attempted by the writers/directors ofthis movie? *         Is this a realistic account of human nature, or is this morefictitious? Life imitating art or art imitating life? *         What one scenario in the film strikes you the most?  Why.  Isthere a scene that you personally relate to based on your experience(s)in life?  Describe. *         Pick one of the characters and work to defend theiractions/behaviors/thoughts toward one of the other characters in thefilm.  Intentionally select a controversial/provocative person in themovie.



 Crash is set in Los Angeles and (with its controlling visual metaphor of the car crash) depicts how people often exhibit racist behavior, even when defending themselves from racist behavior, during collisions (with and without cars). They do so when anxious and insecure: when frustrated with problems beyond their control, when threatened with a loss of self-esteem, and when frightened that racial others may dislodge them from their place in the social structure. Racialized behavior is an easy response because racial categories were invented to confer superior and inferior status and still function that way.

Without knowing the people they confront, each of these characters, including the ethnic minority characters, easily reacts to frustrating situations by tapping into a normalized, internalized racial ideology that characterizes racial minorities as inferior




CRASH DRAMATIZES HOW DIVERSE PEOPLE BECOME RACIALIZED AND QUESTIONS RACE ITSELF
Crash not only dramatizes how reactions to fears, frustrations, and perceived threats are often racialized in the U.S., but––as an important part of the national conversation––also works to deconstruct the ideology of racial differences that its characters have internalized. Crash dramatizes how racial categories are fluid rather than fixed and have an historical rather than a biological basis. Scholars have chronicled how Jewish, Irish, and Italian immigrants came to be considered white,9 while Crash shows the reverse: how the racialization of Muslims (and Iranians in particular) as Arab terrorists since 9/11 is creating a new racial group portrayed as opposed to something other than white10 and lumps together (as always) diverse groups of people, including those who are not Arab. The film’s Iranian-American family is shown in the process of racialization. As the father tries to buy a gun (in response to a man who harassed his wife) and takes some time to consider his ammunition choices, the Euro-American gun salesman calls him “Osama” and tells him to “plan a jihad on [his] own time.” When the Iranian American’s store is vandalized, graffiti labeling his family as “rag heads” and “Arabs” prompts his wife’s protest: “When did Persians become Arabs?”11 The film suggests that the U.S. is a gun culture of fear exacerbated by creating terrorists abroad and at home, as the Iranian-American shopkeeper becomes as paranoid as the gun salesman and those who vandalize his store. Here Crash echoes real-world news accounts of harassed Muslim Americans and the media mislabeling of Barack Obama to discredit him as a viable presidential candidate.12 Crash can help students understand how historical circumstances and xenophobic fears, rather than biological realities, create and sustain racial groups, and how, as newly racialized others, Muslim and Arab Americans now serve as additional scapegoats for fears and frustrations that fuel more fears and frustrations.



while the U.S. Census Bureau continues to count people by racial categories, as if there really are racial differences, it also undermines its own distinctions by periodically changing both the categories and who it says belongs to each one. And it mixes what it now says are major categories of race––white, African American, American Indian, and Asian American––with what it says is one ethnic group, claiming Hispanics (or Latinos) constitute a distinct cultural group that can be of any race, including white.14 Students can research the history of the U.S. Census Bureau’s changing racial categories from its first 1790 Census to its 2000 Census to chronicle the fluid nature of what we call race and to understand how race is a believed fiction that needs to be questioned and can be replaced with categories of cultural heritage that are not linked to essentialist ideas about superiority and inferiority.



INSTITUTIONALIZED / SYSTEMIC RACISM IN CRASH
In illustrating how ignoring institutionalized racism maintains it, Crash defines institutionalized racism as that which has become normalized as part of a social system to the point that everyone finds it in their best interest to ignore it, if they even recognize it. Crashportrays institutionalized racism in a number of scenes, but perhaps most effectively with the Euro-American rookie policeman, Officer Tommy Hansen. Officer Hansen, after witnessing Officer Ryan’s racial profiling and molestation, complains that he wants a new non-racist partner. The African American LAPD Lieutenant in charge refuses to report the complaint about Officer Ryan, who has been under the Lieutenant’s supervision for 11 years, based on his fear that it could reflect poorly on his supervision and cost him his hard-earned job. Since the African-American Police Lieutenant will not publicly admit that the LAPD has any racist policemen, because he would likely be targeted as the problem, racial profiling goes unreported, unrecorded, and unchecked. Students can analyze how Crash emphasizes that even non-racist whites such as Officer Hansen can help to maintain institutionalized racism. Trained as a police officer to consider that all African-American males may be criminals with loaded guns in their pockets, when Officer Hansen picks up a hitchhiker, he inadvertently continues the racial profiling he earlier complained about. Armed with prejudices, he does not believe that any African-American male could enjoy ice skating and hockey and he shoots Peter for trying to remove a St. Christopher statue (which he mistakenly thinks is a gun) from his pocket. Students can analyze how, in exposing instances of institutionalized racism embedded in our law enforcement system, Crash invites viewers to understand that eliminating racism is not just a matter of ending individual discrimination through education. It also means uncovering and eliminating the racism perpetuated by simply maintaining the status quo in race relations.



Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Day 16 (16-day format)

Attendance

Exam review games

Break

Final Exam

Have a great break!

Day 15 (16-day format): Linguistic Diversity

what would life be like w/o language?

Day 14 (16-day format)

Prahayana



I don't know if this is the right day, but for the class on bodies and shit, norms and heightism.

Day 13 (16-day format): Class

Class

Why do most americans think they're "middle class"?

Interrogating Inequality

Play Spent!

Watch PBS Frontline: TWO AMERICAN FAMILIES
+ other video
bill moyers article?




6:00 - Attendance, collect Daily Top 5 lists, facilitators confer

6:10 - Discussion lead by
 (???)






7:30 - Instructor-lead discussion
 


What is Bill missing?  Why can't money buy you class, and why does he regret not getting more education? ---> 227

SocioEconomic Status

"Class" implies stratification and inequality...

Meritocracy and the American work-ethic as cultural values

Wealth vs. Income

The state of inequality in America (228)

Stratification determines how resources are distributed in a population. 
Paradoxically, the more resources a society has, the less equal this distribution is.
This short video explains this paradox that abundance causes inequality.

Hunter/gatherers - 1 calorie expended for every 3 calories gained, very little stratification

Horticultural and pastoral - 1:5
Agricultural - 1:50
Industrial - 1:5,000
 

Industrial Revolution, Great Depression, WWII, post-war era, Information Revolution and globalization...
Marx and Weber (229)

Marx's dialectical cycle of history
Complications regarding Marx's simplistic view (stock, unions...)
Weber's wealth, power, & prestige dimensions (explains Bill's predicament)



Poverty/homelessness - "opportunities and life chances are not distributed equally" (231)?
Over 10% of Americans live in poverty < $23,000 for a family of 4 (Play SPENT?)
Kids are more likely to be poor than adults, and therefore lack opportunities, education, nutrition, etc... which then perpetuates the vicious cycle of poverty.
Check out the new Frontline special: Poor Kids.  It's the first Frontline made from children's point of view.Meritocracy -------- Class --------- Caste
(13)


CLASS IN THE U.S.A.
  • We are becoming less of a “middle-class” society as inequality grows. A small minority have most of our wealth, better education, health, longer lives, etc.
  • What are the classes?
    1. Upper class (about 5%)
      • upper-upper class gets their wealth through inheritance (i.e. old money)(a.k.a. "the 1%")
      • lower-upper class may have similar or even greater wealth, but they earned it somehow through their own efforts and abilities
    2. Middle class (about 35%)
      • upper-middle class are doctors, lawyers, engineers, businesspeople who are doing very well in terms of income; they have some wealth and investments that make additional money for them, too.
      • average middle class people tend to have white-collar jobs: they are managers, teachers, civil servants, and even some highly skilled blue-collar workers (tradesmen, contractors).  They usually have a bit of wealth, but it is almost entirely tied up in homes and retirement savings.
    3. Working class a.k.a. "lower-middle class" people (about 35%) are mostly blue-collar or service-industry workers with routinized jobs requiring little creativity.  They get few benefits and have little or no wealth, usually renting or perhaps owning inexpensive homes in poor neighborhoods. Their kids probably won't go to college.  They are vulnerable to illness and unemployment, since they probably lack health insurance and have no wealth to tide them over while looking for work after they lose a job.
    4. Lower class people a.k.a. "the working poor" (about 25%), half of them are in poverty.  If they have a job at all, their job pays very little, has low prestige, and certainly offers no benefits or job security.  They are extremely vulnerable to illness and unemployment, and often rely on social safety nets to meet basic needs.

Domination, Hegemony, and Resistance

Public/hidden transcripts?

Ideology and internalizing the values of dominators, accepting their "naturalness"

A stratification system also consists of the beliefs that support it.
  • For example, India's caste system is accepted as fair and just because of belief in dharma (duty), karma, and reincarnation.
  • The United Kingdom's old caste system was accepted as fair and just because of belief in predestination and the "divine right of kings."
  • The beliefs that allow us to accept our American brand of stratification as fair and just are beliefs such as that people get what they deserve: "rich people are rich because they are smart and hard-working, and poor people are poorbecause they are lazy and foolish."  Social darwinism.
What factors determine resistance/??(236)

Discourse (236)

Brazil?

Do we have an ideology of equality? (238)

Brazil - who do you think you are? vs. do you know who you are talking to? (239)

poor rural whites vs. poor urban blacks?


Problems of identity politics for the poor... (242)

What about 1996 welfare reform?



FOR NEXT TIME
 :

  • Read Chapter 14: Places and Spaces, and prepare your Top Ten list
  • 3rd Diversity Encounter due (on the Discussion Board)
  • ONLY: ??? prepare to lead a discussion on Chapter ??

Day 12 (16-day format): Bodies, Fitness, and Health

6:00 - Attendance, collect Daily Top 5 lists


Group 12 confers: ???

6:10 - Discussion of Chapter 12


7:30 - Break

7:40 - Instructor-led discussion

Ability and Disability

"Health" as a social construct

The status of pregnancy?

Ailment as master status... is this stigmatizing?

Does society treat disability as abnormal and disabled people as aliens?

What does it mean that "social structures and institutions alienate, marginalize, and often threaten people with disabilities" (207)?

Examined Life with Judith Butler

Impairment vs. disability

(NPR article on inclusive playgrounds: "Play teaches children how to make friends, make rules and navigate relationships. But for kids whose disabilities keep them from using playgrounds, those opportunities can be lost.")

American value of self-reliance...

What is the "social construction of disability" (207)?

What is a "culture of disability" and how does it "resist and subvert the social standards of fitness that alienate and exclude them" (208)?  Is this another example of identity politics?  Is it important to change our language because people with impairments feel dehumanized?

8:00 ------------

:Body variation and enhancement:

Beauty standards change...

Why are there more muscular Americans, and more fatter Americans, than a generation ago?

Is bodily identity an ascribed or achieved status? (209-10)  America vs. Brazil...

What about the value of individual responsibility (and therefore, laying blame on victims) in leading us to an "irrational attitude that we can fend off all risks if we just live right..." (211)?

Class implications (212)?

Stereotypes of sports players?


8:10
:Well and sick bodies:

What is the sick role? (213)
Does labeling theory apply (214)?

Intersectionality: race, class, gender, age, etc...
e.g. why the different rates for men and women of death by:

  1. accidents?
  2. AIDS?
  3. suicide?
  4. stroke?

Is breast-cancer awareness political?  Why?
Here's some info about the controversies surrounding the Susan G. Komen foundation and "pinkwashing."



8:20 -
People With Disabilities

3 domains: communication, mental, physical

36 million Americans (~12%)


What did the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) do?

What are SSI and SSDI? (219)

8:30 - While we're on the subject of health, what does the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA) or, as it is commonly known, "ObamaCare" do?

First let's talk about health insurance:

According to the U.S.Census Bureau, the proportion of our population that lacks health insurance is at an all time high of about 51 million.
The cost of health insurance has been spiraling out of control for decades, going up ten times faster than wages since 2000. 

Meanwhile industry profits ticked up 250% in the same period.  This is why the U.S. Congress finally passed a health care reform law in 2010, after more than a decade of discussing it.  The criticism of our health care system is that "for-profit" insurance companies have been gaming the system to increase profits by pricing out the poor and the sick, which is bad for society: when poor, struggling workers get sick or injured, they're not going to just crawl under a rock and die - they have a job to do and a family to support, so they're going to head for the emergency room.  This kind of care is far more expensive, and since the poor don't have that kind of money, the hospital has to stick the taxpayers with the bill.  So we end up paying more money for emergency health care, and this system keeps about 1 in 6 Americans from getting access to basic preventative medicine, which means more minor issues will progress to major problems requiring more of that expensive emergency-room care! 
Why would our system do such a thing?  The health insurance industry is not easy to understand.  The point of insurance in general is to distribute risk through a population, so that individuals are not ruined by unpredictable disasters.  You get car insurance or home insurance just in case a rare bad thing happens, and the small amount you pay per month goes to help the small proportion of people who actually have that bad thing happen to them.
Health insurance in particular also serves another function: helping people bear the predictable costs of maintenance and prevention (check-ups and medicine to cure minor illnesses before they lead to major social disruptions). 
Both of these are socially useful functions – they keep people productive, and that keeps society running smoothly.  But in an industry of private health insurance, companies must make a profit.  Profit-making is their purpose.  In order to do that, they use society's demand for the above functions to raise the price at which they can sell their supply of services.  But their fundamental purpose is not to distribute risk, nor to help people maintain their health – it is to make profits.  If they are not distributing risk optimally, and they are not helping people maintain their health in the best way, but they are still making profits for their shareholders, then they are still fulfilling their raison d'etre.  For decades, the “free market” has been rewarding them for sub-optimal service, so it doesn't make sense to say they "failed," exactly.  What proponents of ObamaCare say does make sense is to change the rules of the game, to give them motivation to actually provide socially useful services, and that is what the health reform law is meant to do.

OK so what DOES the law actually do?  Well it's a bit complicated, but basically something like this...



Mental health?

Diversity in sickness and in health?



FOR NEXT TIME:

  • Read Chapter 13: Class, and prepare your Daily Top 5 list
  • ONLY: ??? - prepare to facilitate a discussion on Chapter 13
  • Reminder - 3 days until the Career Article Critique paper is due...

Day 11 (16-day format): Age and Cohort

6:00 - Attendance
collect Daily Top 5 lists

Chapter 11 group confers: 
(???)

6:10 - Group-lead discussion

7:30 - break

7:40 - Instructor-lead discussion


Hopefully, you know what age means.  What is a "cohort"?


What cohorts are there in America?
  1. Lost Generation - born at the end of the 1800's, came of age during WWI, enjoyed prosperity of the "roaring" 1920's, virtually all gone now
  2. Greatest Generation - early 1900-'25, came of age during the Great Depression and fought in WWII
  3. Silent Generation - 1925-'45, children during Great Depression, too young for WWII but fought the Korean war, grave and fatalistic
  4. Baby Boomers - 1945-'60, post-war economic boom caused many people who had waited to start families, grew up with affluence and optimism, Cold War with space race and moon landing as formative events, fought the Vietnam war
  5. Generation X - '60s & '70s, "Baby Bust" drop in fertility rates with increased industrialization, hippie counter-culture, high education, Civil Rights movement as formative, first major generation gap (see p.190) caused resistance to war and resentment towards elders
  6. Millennials - '80s & '90s (& maybe early 2000s), Generation Y, the "Me" generation is more self-centered (less civic participation, more materialistic), 9/11 and Iraq/Afghanistan wars as formative events
  7. iGeneration - 2000's - present, Generation Z, children today who never knew a world without advanced technology, multiculturalism, and globalization. Highly connected through social media, possibly will see the Great Recession as a formative influence.


 



Children can't wait to be grown-ups
 
Teenagers look forward to independence
 
Old folks wish they could be young again
 
Does this imply that our culture values a certain age category?
What is the "meaning" of being old in our culture?  Being young? (195)






The Social Construction of Childhood (and other life course stages)... cultural variable

Childhood - Kids often work in other countries.  In European art from the middle ages, we often see depictions of kids as small adults, identical in all other ways to adults. We are in a rich country so kids don't HAVE to work, so our culture has shifted to define childhood as carefree and playful.  An economic impact of industrialization was the "separation of public and private spheres," and that more education and skills are required of workers, so formal education has become more important...  But it wasn't always this way.  Here's the Lost Generation in photos from 1908-12.
When are kids "adults?"  This has obviously changed since 1908, but is it still changing?  Is it reversing in direction?  In America we extend childhood longer, relative to the rest of the world, so of course we are concerned when kids grow up faster, or when there seems to be pressure to grow up faster.
What about imposing adulthood and sexuality on children (Toddlers & Tiaras, etc...)?
Where does this pressure come from?
kids' natural emulation of adults + cultural impetus from media + increasingly indulgent parents (perhaps trying to live vicariously through their children, like in Toddlers & Tiaras - but in doing so are imposing an adult frame of understanding childhood on their kids)
Adolescence – The idea of that there is a long stage between childhood and (young) adulthood that is characterized by immaturity and capriciousness is only about 120 years old.  Before this idea was invented, children were expected to take on adult roles as soon as they were able, apprenticing their parents and transitioning to adulthood with the onset of puberty.  Sociologist point out that the confusion and emotion we associate with the teenage years come not just from biological puberty, but from social confusion over norms and status (anomie).  Teenages are assailed with contradictory messages of being no longer children, but not yet adults either: they can go to war but not drink alcohol; they can be sexy but shouldn't have sex; they should be developing their own independent personalities yet are told to obey their parents...
Adulthood – support yourself, career goals, parenting, different for men and women, have to face aging which our culture doesn't like. (youth-worship, Ageism)
Working class = adults around 20 or shortly after high school, start work and parenting.
Wealthy = adults around 30 or after college, maybe even graduate school or traveling.
Old Age – retirement, hobbies/self-actualization, health problems, social security, become a burden?



 


What does it mean that aging is a "universal, genetically programmed process" and that, "as a sociocultural process... it varies in structure, content, and meaning?"
 
If it is universal, how can it vary in structure?
In content?
In meaning?
 





Do class, race, ethnicity, and/or gender interact with age in socially significant ways?
(see gender vs. death and poverty rates on p.192)



 



Small-scale, low-tech societies are often gerontocracies.
Why?
Why not large-scale, high-tech societies?
 




Are we "overinformed and underenlightened?" (187)
What are the differences in how elderly folks are viewed in these two kinds of societies?

How does each kind of society take care of its elderly?



 



 

We will all go through the same age categories, so how does age affect our identity?  "Most people probably don't recognize aging by looking in the mirror; they do so situationally and by comparison, gradually perceiving themselves in relation to others who are younger or older." (189)
 





People are living longer... why?
 
Older people have more assets than younger people... why?
  

What does it mean that we are approaching a "Gray Dawn" as the Baby Boomers age?

Economic issues?

Political issues?

Cultural issues?  What does "Go south, old woman, go south!" mean?  (196)


 




What does it mean that diversity is increasing among the young? ("The Gray and the Brown" p.198)

Whites are 80% of older Americans, they grew up mainly in white suburbs, and they are now forming mostly homogenous retirement communities... but only 56% of American children are white, and they are experiencing more diversity and multiculturalism... what will this mean for our future?

What's going on in Arizona? (199)

Are the elderly in trouble because they are not valued in our high-tech world and we put value on investing in our kids?

Or are they doing well because we spend $7/senior for every $1/child we spend? (200)  Why is that such a strong federal priority?

How does the Tea Party fit in? (18% Americans support, mostly older and white, although only 4% actually donate or attend events)
Identity Politics again...  Cohorts?  Age groups?



For Next Time:
  • Read Chapter 12: Bodies, Fitness, and Health, and prepare your Top Ten list
  • ONLY: (???) - prepare to facilitate a discussion on Chapter 12